<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MetroFi To PTP: Up Yours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.furiousnads.com/2007/03/metrofi-to-ptp-up-yours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.furiousnads.com/2007/03/metrofi-to-ptp-up-yours/</link>
	<description>You're furious. I never taught you to sing. You carry rocks in your head and pitch them. Without warning. Happy drunk. You're furious. I beg you for sin. I beg your skin. You buy a whore. Don't give her water. You're furious.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://www.furiousnads.com/2007/03/metrofi-to-ptp-up-yours/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 07:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://furiousnads.com/2007/03/metrofi-to-ptp-up-yours/#comment-411</guid>
		<description>The usable-coverage based on random sample is actually only about 1/3 of our full set of tests. We've tested just about everything required by the original testing IRFP. I have no problem with MetroFi questioning my (and Russell's) qualifications (in fact, I hope they are just as healthily skeptical about our qualifications as we are of their network), but I think it'd be wise of them to at least survey our methodologies before casting judgement. Since they know literally nothing about us or our test at this point, it is clear that this press release was motivated primarily by either ignorance or slander. We've asked that MetroFi release a correction for at least the factual errors - I'm not sure how that will turn out...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The usable-coverage based on random sample is actually only about 1/3 of our full set of tests. We&#8217;ve tested just about everything required by the original testing IRFP. I have no problem with MetroFi questioning my (and Russell&#8217;s) qualifications (in fact, I hope they are just as healthily skeptical about our qualifications as we are of their network), but I think it&#8217;d be wise of them to at least survey our methodologies before casting judgement. Since they know literally nothing about us or our test at this point, it is clear that this press release was motivated primarily by either ignorance or slander. We&#8217;ve asked that MetroFi release a correction for at least the factual errors - I&#8217;m not sure how that will turn out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
